Chew Lian Chua, G.C. Lim and Penelope Smith have a new
paper in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics. This models the trajectory of credit ratings of companies. While there are 26 possible rating classes, these are grouped to the 4 broad classes: A,B,C,D, Movement between any two classes is deemed possible resulting in 12 possible transition types. The authors develop methods for fitting what is termed a multi-state latent factor intensity model. This is essentially a multi-state model with a shared random effect that affects all the transition intensities, but the random effect is allowed to evolve in time. For instance, the authors assume the random effect is an AR(1) process.
There seems to be some confusion in the formulation of the model as to whether the process is in continuous or discrete time: The process is expressed in terms of intensities which are "informally" defined as
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87abb/87abbf6be73a55ea7d2cc6d5e6dcadf6910dcf19" alt="\inline N_{sk}(t)")
is a counting process describing the number of s to k transitions that have occurred to time t and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25b70/25b7001ed2d1f02a1e82b0ac148d7f2492fff0f5" alt="\inline t_{i-1}"
is the ith observation time. But if the time between observations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/059e5/059e55480b932d54936287f14eff95c479c42a49" alt="\inline t_{i} - t_{i-1}"
were variable, the AR(1) formulation (which takes no account of this) would not seem sensible.
Nevertheless the idea of having a random effect that can vary temporally within a multi-state model (proposed by
Koopman et al) is interesting, though obviously presents various computational challenges which is the main focus of Chua, Lim and Smith's paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment